Watch our video on estimation pitfalls
Developers routinely underestimate task durations due to optimism bias, focusing on the best-case scenario instead of accounting for inevitable obstacles.
Software projects encompass variables that can’t be foreseen—ranging from technical challenges to evolving requirements that surface during development.
Minor changes in interconnected systems can have cascading effects, making it difficult to gauge true complexity from the outset.
Business pressures often force overly optimistic estimates, leading to unrealistic timelines and compromised planning accuracy.
Without proper records of past estimates versus actuals, teams miss out on insights that could refine future estimation processes.
Traditional estimation methods fail to capture the non-linear dynamics of software development, leading to chronic underestimation.
You're frustrated by consistently missed deadlines and budget overruns on your software projects
Your team struggles to provide realistic estimates that stakeholders can rely on for planning
You want to improve estimation accuracy without requiring extensive historical data or complex statistical models
You need a systematic approach to account for uncertainty and risk in your project planning
You're looking for practical tools and techniques that can be implemented immediately to improve your estimation process
"After implementing AlgoCademy's estimation framework, our project delivery accuracy improved dramatically. We went from consistently missing deadlines by 40% to delivering within 10% of our estimated timeframes. The difference in team morale and client satisfaction has been incredible."
"The consistent failure of our software estimates was causing serious budget issues. AlgoCademy's approach helped us identify our blind spots and implement a more realistic estimation process. Now we can confidently communicate timelines to stakeholders without constant fear of missing the mark."
"I used to think accurate software estimates were impossible. After using AlgoCademy's methods, I've completely changed my perspective. We now have a structured approach that accounts for uncertainty and complexity, and our estimates have become significantly more reliable. This has transformed how we plan and execute projects."
View All Testimonials
of software projects exceed their estimated timeline by at least 50%
developers report regular frustration with inaccurate project estimates
reduction in estimation errors achieved by teams using our structured methodology
of project managers report improved stakeholder satisfaction after adopting better estimation practices
Andrei has represented Romania in many international competitive programming contests. His highest achievement to date is winning the bronze medal at the Central European Olympiad in Informatics.
Andrei has also worked for Amazon and Keystone. Since 2015, he's been training students for the International Olympiad and preparing aspiring engineers to crush their coding interviews.
Fun fact: Andrei has a YouTube Channel and had the highest-rated course on Udemy before AlgoCademy was born.
Mircea has worked as a Software Engineer at companies including Facebook, Adobe, Ubisoft, and two NYC startups.
He has built many innovative products using algorithms and data structures, such as Autocorrect and Swipe Typing for the iOS keyboard, Music Recommendation Engine, and Real-Time Optimal Exchange Algorithm. Mircea has been a coding interview and competitive programming coach for over a decade.
Fun fact: Mircea has written a peer reviewed Scientific Paper on Algorithms.
Our Students landed jobs at
Swipe left through the table to compare.
Check out our YouTube channel
While our estimation framework significantly improves accuracy, it doesn't eliminate all uncertainties. It's designed to provide better guidance, but adjustments may still be necessary as projects evolve.
Yes, our methods are versatile and can be adapted to both small and complex projects, delivering improved estimates regardless of scale.
No, our approach leverages best practices and AI-powered insights, allowing you to generate more accurate estimates even with limited past data.
Many of our clients report noticeable enhancements in estimation accuracy within just a few project cycles after implementation.
Absolutely. Our framework is designed to seamlessly complement your current tools and methodologies, providing a systematic approach to refine your estimates.
Yes, teams using our structured estimation methods have achieved up to a 64% reduction in errors, along with improved stakeholder satisfaction.
We stand behind our framework and are committed to your success. Please contact us if you don't see improvements, and we'll work with you to optimize your approach.
Our team offers comprehensive support and resources to ensure a smooth integration of our methods into your project planning process.