We have a collection of stones, where each stone has a positive integer weight.
Each turn, we choose the two heaviest stones and smash them together. Suppose the stones have weights x and y with x <= y. The result of this smash is:
At the end, there is at most 1 stone left. Return the weight of this stone (or 0 if there are no stones left.)
Example:
Input: [2,7,4,1,8,1] Output: 1 Explanation: We combine 7 and 8 to get 1 so the array converts to [2,4,1,1,1] then, we combine 2 and 4 to get 2 so the array converts to [2,1,1,1] then, we combine 2 and 1 to get 1 so the array converts to [1,1,1] then, we combine 1 and 1 to get 0 so the array converts to [1] then that's the value of the last stone.
The core challenge of this problem is to repeatedly find and process the two heaviest stones until only one stone remains or all stones are destroyed. This problem is significant in scenarios where we need to repeatedly process the largest elements, such as in certain scheduling or resource allocation problems.
Potential pitfalls include not efficiently finding the two heaviest stones, which can lead to suboptimal performance.
To solve this problem, we need to efficiently find and process the two heaviest stones. A naive approach would involve sorting the list repeatedly, but this is not optimal. Instead, we can use a max-heap (priority queue) to always access the heaviest stones efficiently.
The naive solution involves sorting the list to find the two heaviest stones, which is inefficient due to the repeated sorting operations.
Using a max-heap allows us to efficiently find and remove the heaviest stones. In Python, we can use the `heapq` module, which provides a min-heap by default. By storing negative weights, we can simulate a max-heap.
import heapq
def lastStoneWeight(stones):
# Convert all stone weights to negative to use heapq as a max-heap
stones = [-stone for stone in stones]
heapq.heapify(stones)
# Process the stones until one or none is left
while len(stones) > 1:
# Extract the two heaviest stones
first = heapq.heappop(stones)
second = heapq.heappop(stones)
# If they are not equal, push the difference back into the heap
if first != second:
heapq.heappush(stones, first - second)
# If no stones are left, return 0; otherwise, return the weight of the remaining stone
return -stones[0] if stones else 0
# Example usage
print(lastStoneWeight([2, 7, 4, 1, 8, 1])) # Output: 1
The time complexity of this approach is O(n log n), where n is the number of stones. This is because each insertion and extraction operation on the heap takes O(log n) time, and we perform these operations n-1 times. The space complexity is O(n) due to the storage of the heap.
Potential edge cases include:
These cases are handled by the algorithm as it processes the heap until one or no stones are left.
To test the solution comprehensively, consider the following test cases:
Using a testing framework like `unittest` in Python can help automate and validate these test cases.
When approaching such problems, consider the following tips:
Understanding and solving the "Last Stone Weight" problem helps improve your skills in using heaps and priority queues. It also highlights the importance of choosing the right data structures for efficient problem-solving.
Keep practicing and exploring further to enhance your algorithmic thinking and coding skills.
Our interactive tutorials and AI-assisted learning will help you master problem-solving skills and teach you the algorithms to know for coding interviews.
Start Coding for FREE