Given the heads of two singly linked-lists headA
and headB
, return the node at which the two lists intersect. If the two linked lists have no intersection at all, return null
.
For example, the following two linked lists begin to intersect at node c1
:
The test cases are generated such that there are no cycles anywhere in the entire linked structure.
Note that the linked lists must retain their original structure after the function returns.
Custom Judge:
The inputs to the judge are given as follows (your program is not given these inputs):
intersectVal
- The value of the node where the intersection occurs. This is 0
if there is no intersected node.listA
- The first linked list.listB
- The second linked list.skipA
- The number of nodes to skip ahead in listA
(starting from the head) to get to the intersected node.skipB
- The number of nodes to skip ahead in listB
(starting from the head) to get to the intersected node.The judge will then create the linked structure based on these inputs and pass the two heads, headA
and headB
to your program. If you correctly return the intersected node, then your solution will be accepted.
Example 1:
Input: intersectVal = 8, listA = [4,1,8,4,5], listB = [5,6,1,8,4,5], skipA = 2, skipB = 3 Output: Intersected at '8' Explanation: The intersected node's value is 8 (note that this must not be 0 if the two lists intersect). From the head of A, it reads as [4,1,8,4,5]. From the head of B, it reads as [5,6,1,8,4,5]. There are 2 nodes before the intersected node in A; There are 3 nodes before the intersected node in B.
Example 2:
Input: intersectVal = 2, listA = [1,9,1,2,4], listB = [3,2,4], skipA = 3, skipB = 1 Output: Intersected at '2' Explanation: The intersected node's value is 2 (note that this must not be 0 if the two lists intersect). From the head of A, it reads as [1,9,1,2,4]. From the head of B, it reads as [3,2,4]. There are 3 nodes before the intersected node in A; There are 1 node before the intersected node in B.
Example 3:
Input: intersectVal = 0, listA = [2,6,4], listB = [1,5], skipA = 3, skipB = 2 Output: No intersection Explanation: From the head of A, it reads as [2,6,4]. From the head of B, it reads as [1,5]. Since the two lists do not intersect, intersectVal must be 0, while skipA and skipB can be arbitrary values. Explanation: The two lists do not intersect, so return null.
Constraints:
listA
is in the m
.listB
is in the n
.1 <= m, n <= 3 * 104
1 <= Node.val <= 105
0 <= skipA < m
0 <= skipB < n
intersectVal
is 0
if listA
and listB
do not intersect.intersectVal == listA[skipA] == listB[skipB]
if listA
and listB
intersect.Follow up: Could you write a solution that runs in
O(m + n)
time and use only O(1)
memory?The core challenge of this problem is to identify the node at which two singly linked lists intersect. This is a common problem in linked list manipulation and has applications in various fields such as network routing, version control systems, and more. A potential pitfall is assuming that the lists intersect at the same position from the start, which is not necessarily true.
To solve this problem, we can use the following approaches:
The naive approach involves using two nested loops to compare each node of the first list with each node of the second list. This approach has a time complexity of O(m * n), which is not optimal for large lists.
We can optimize the solution by using two pointers. The idea is to traverse both lists and switch to the other list once the end is reached. This way, both pointers will traverse the same number of nodes and meet at the intersection point if there is one.
Here is a step-by-step breakdown of the optimized algorithm:
pA
and pB
, to the heads of headA
and headB
respectively.Here is the Python code for the optimized solution:
class ListNode:
def __init__(self, x):
self.val = x
self.next = None
def getIntersectionNode(headA, headB):
# Initialize two pointers
pA, pB = headA, headB
# Traverse the lists
while pA != pB:
# If pA reaches the end, switch to headB
pA = pA.next if pA else headB
# If pB reaches the end, switch to headA
pB = pB.next if pB else headA
# Either both pointers meet at the intersection node or both are null
return pA
The time complexity of this approach is O(m + n), where m and n are the lengths of the two linked lists. The space complexity is O(1) since we are using only two pointers.
Potential edge cases include:
These cases are handled by the algorithm as it ensures that both pointers traverse the same number of nodes.
To test the solution comprehensively, consider the following test cases:
Using a testing framework like unittest
in Python can help automate and validate these test cases.
When approaching such problems, consider the following tips:
In this blog post, we discussed the problem of finding the intersection of two linked lists. We explored a naive approach and an optimized approach using two pointers. The optimized solution runs in O(m + n) time and uses O(1) space. Understanding and solving such problems is crucial for improving algorithmic thinking and coding skills.
For further reading and practice, consider the following resources: