Given an array of positive integers nums, return the smallest k values, in any order you want.
Example:
Input: nums = [5, 9, 3, 6, 2, 1, 3, 2, 7, 5], k = 4 Output: [1, 2, 2, 3] Explanation: Smallest number is 1, 2nd smallest is 2, 3rd smallest is 2, 4th smallest is 3
The result can be in any order, [2, 1, 3, 2] is also a correct answer.
For this lesson, your algorithm should run in O(n log n) time and use O(1) extra space.
(There are faster solutions which we will discuss in future lessons)
The core challenge of this problem is to find the smallest k integers from an array of positive integers. This is a common problem in computer science, often referred to as the "k smallest elements" problem. It has applications in various fields such as data analysis, statistics, and machine learning where selecting a subset of data based on certain criteria is required.
Potential pitfalls include misunderstanding the requirement to return the smallest k values in any order and not optimizing the solution to meet the O(n log n) time complexity constraint.
To solve this problem, we can consider the following approaches:
A naive solution would be to sort the entire array and then return the first k elements. This approach is simple but not optimal in terms of time complexity.
Given the constraint of O(n log n) time complexity, the most straightforward optimized solution is to sort the array and then select the first k elements. Sorting the array takes O(n log n) time, and selecting the first k elements takes O(k) time, which is negligible compared to the sorting time.
Here is a step-by-step breakdown of the optimized algorithm:
// Function to find the smallest k integers
function smallestKIntegers(nums, k) {
// Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
// Step 2: Select the first k elements
return nums.slice(0, k);
}
// Example usage
const nums = [5, 9, 3, 6, 2, 1, 3, 2, 7, 5];
const k = 4;
console.log(smallestKIntegers(nums, k)); // Output: [1, 2, 2, 3]
The time complexity of the optimized solution is O(n log n) due to the sorting step. The space complexity is O(1) as we are not using any additional space that scales with the input size.
Potential edge cases include:
To test the solution comprehensively, consider the following test cases:
// Test case 1: General case
console.log(smallestKIntegers([5, 9, 3, 6, 2, 1, 3, 2, 7, 5], 4)); // Output: [1, 2, 2, 3]
// Test case 2: k is greater than the length of the array
console.log(smallestKIntegers([5, 9, 3], 5)); // Output: [3, 5, 9]
// Test case 3: k is 0
console.log(smallestKIntegers([5, 9, 3], 0)); // Output: []
// Test case 4: Array contains duplicate values
console.log(smallestKIntegers([1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4], 3)); // Output: [1, 2, 2]
When approaching such problems, consider the following tips:
In this blog post, we discussed how to solve the problem of finding the smallest k integers from an array of positive integers. We explored a naive solution and an optimized solution that meets the O(n log n) time complexity constraint. We also covered edge cases, testing, and provided tips for approaching such problems. Understanding and solving such problems is crucial for developing strong problem-solving skills in computer science.
For further reading and practice, consider the following resources:
Our interactive tutorials and AI-assisted learning will help you master problem-solving skills and teach you the algorithms to know for coding interviews.
Start Coding for FREE