Given an array of positive integers nums, return the smallest k values, in any order you want.
Example:
Input: nums = [5, 9, 3, 6, 2, 1, 3, 2, 7, 5], k = 4 Output: [1, 2, 2, 3] Explanation: Smallest number is 1, 2nd smallest is 2, 3rd smallest is 2, 4th smallest is 3
The result can be in any order, [2, 1, 3, 2] is also a correct answer.
For this lesson, your algorithm should run in O(n log maxVal) time and use O(1) extra space.
The core challenge of this problem is to find the smallest k integers from an array of positive integers. This problem is significant in scenarios where we need to filter out the smallest elements from a large dataset, such as in data analysis or competitive programming.
Potential pitfalls include misunderstanding the requirement to return the smallest k values in any order and not optimizing the solution to meet the time complexity constraint.
To solve this problem, we can consider several approaches:
A naive solution would be to sort the array and then return the first k elements. However, this approach has a time complexity of O(n log n), which is not optimal for this problem.
We can use a min-heap (priority queue) to efficiently find the smallest k elements. The min-heap allows us to keep track of the smallest elements as we iterate through the array. This approach has a time complexity of O(n log k), which is better but still not optimal for the given constraints.
To achieve the required O(n log maxVal) time complexity, we can use a counting sort-like approach. This approach leverages the fact that the array contains positive integers, and we can use an array to count the occurrences of each integer. This method ensures we meet the time complexity constraint and uses O(1) extra space.
Here is a step-by-step breakdown of the optimal algorithm:
import java.util.*;
public class SmallestKIntegers {
public static List<Integer> findSmallestK(int[] nums, int k) {
// Step 1: Find the maximum value in the array
int maxVal = Arrays.stream(nums).max().getAsInt();
// Step 2: Create a counting array
int[] count = new int[maxVal + 1];
// Step 3: Populate the counting array
for (int num : nums) {
count[num]++;
}
// Step 4: Collect the smallest k integers
List<Integer> result = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < count.length && result.size() < k; i++) {
while (count[i] > 0 && result.size() < k) {
result.add(i);
count[i]--;
}
}
return result;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] nums = {5, 9, 3, 6, 2, 1, 3, 2, 7, 5};
int k = 4;
List<Integer> smallestK = findSmallestK(nums, k);
System.out.println(smallestK);
}
}
The time complexity of the optimal solution is O(n log maxVal) because we iterate through the input array to populate the counting array and then iterate through the counting array to collect the smallest k integers. The space complexity is O(1) extra space since the counting array size depends on the maximum value in the input array, not the input size.
Potential edge cases include:
To test the solution comprehensively, consider the following test cases:
When approaching such problems, consider the following tips:
In this blog post, we discussed how to find the smallest k integers from an array of positive integers. We explored different approaches, including a naive solution and an optimal solution using a counting sort-like approach. We also provided a detailed algorithm, code implementation, complexity analysis, and testing strategies. Understanding and solving such problems is crucial for improving your algorithmic thinking and coding skills.
For further reading and practice, consider the following resources: